| Profilo di ruisubject: exchangeFotoBlogElenchi | Guida |
|
19 aprile I'm moving...I'm moving this blog to http://www.msmvps.com/ehlo/. I think that the msmvps.com site is more appropriate for technical content than Spaces. So, don't forget to update your feed reader ;-) 08 aprile It's official, I'm now an MVP!22 febbraio Poor Man's LibraryThere are great Exchange documentation sources on the internet. The Microsoft Exchange Team is probably the most active team in producing good technical documents. Also there are other dedicated sites who publish regular articles. But there's nothing like the smell of paper and a fat Exchange book looks good on any shelf. Unfortunately the price of books is not as cheap as it should be (at least for me, who lives in a country with one of the smallest buying power in Europe). So, if I can't buy the real thing, I'll have to find alternative sources. Most of the authors of Exchange books offer sample chapters of their work. I decided to gather all the sample chapters available publicly. I call it Poor Man's Library: • Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Distilled, Scott Schnoll • Special Edition Using Microsoft Office Outlook 2003, Patricia Cardoza • Microsoft® Exchange Server 2003 24seven, Jim McBee; Barry Gerber • CYA Securing Exchange Server 2003 & Outlook Web Access, Henrik Walther, Patrick Santry • Mastering™ Microsoft® Exchange Server 2003 ,Barry Gerber • Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Delta Guide, David McAmis, Don Jones • Learning Exchange Server 2003, William Boswell • Anti-Spam Tool Kit, Paul Wolfe Charlie Scott Mike Erwi • Microsoft Exchange Server 2003, Tony Redmond • The Administrator Shortcut Guide to Email Protection, Paul Robichaux • Mission-Critical Microsoft Exchange 2003, Jerry Cochran • MCSA/MCSE Implementing and Managing Exchange Server 2003 Exam Cram 2, Orin Thomas, Will Schmied and Ed Tittel • The Definitive Guide to E-Mail Management and Security, Kevin Beaver • Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Unleashed, Rand Morimoto • Secure Messaging with Microsoft Exchange 2003, Paul Robichaux • Monitoring and Managing Microsoft Exchange Server 2003, Mike Daugherty • The Definitive Guide to Windows 2000 and Exchange 2000 Security, Archie Reed, Darren Mar-Elia, and Sean Daily • Secure Messaging with Microsoft® Exchange Server 2000, Paul Robichaux • Microsoft® Exchange 2000 Server Resource Kit, Microsoft Corporation • Configuring Exchange Server 2000, Liz Mason • Microsoft Exchange Server in a Nutshell, Mitch Tulloch
If you know any other sample chapters, please let me know. 07 febbraio You just had to try, didn't you?(Or fun with the Pocket PC Emulator). Pocket PC emulation should be a simple thing, right? That's what I thought! According to a post at You Had Me At EHLO, to install a Pocket PC emulator, this is what you'll need:
I had to do some tests with Exchange ActiveSync, so instead of installing all that stuff on my machine, I asked for a virtual one (Virtual Server 2005). At the end of the long installation process, when I tried to run the emulator for the first time, I got the message on the picture. "You just had to try, didn't you?". You have to laugh. The reason for this beahviour is that, somehow, the Pocket PC Emulator and the Virtual Machine software share some code. Fortunately there's a solution: Visual Studio .NET 2005 Beta 1. After installing the new version I was finally able to mess around with the emulator. 03 febbraio So, you think you know how to apply an hotfix, huh?I was reading Eileen Brown's WebLog when I realized that I really don't know how to apply Exchange service packs and hotfixes. Damn! All these years of working experience should have teached me more. There's a not so new KB article, Q328839, that has the right procedures, so be sure that you follow them religiously. Your Exchange data is definitely something you don't want to mess around. 21 gennaio Improve your Exchange BackupConsolidation is a word you probably hear a lot by these days. We see bigger and bigger Exchange Servers with huge stores and thousands of users. As the size of databases grows, backup technologies must keep up by evolving rapidly and becoming more fast and reliable. Whether you do it by obligation of a service level agreement (SLA) or for any other reason such as compliance or a disaster recovery plan, there’s no way you can live without backup. Besides that, online backup is one of the most important operations to keep a healthy Exchange infrastructure. From a Sysadmin’s point of view, the backup time windows is one of his/hers main concerns, even if he/she isn’t tied with a high demanding SLA. So much data, so little time!
There are many solutions from different vendors to backup an Exchange infrastructure (http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/partners/backup.asp), but you’ll be perfectly well served with the tool provided by Microsoft, Windows Backup (NTBackup). And if time is a problem, on a fat Exchange database you’ll probably want to try a 2-step backup approach: backup to disk first and then dump the resulting file to tape. In this kind of backup there are a couple of things you can do to improve backup performance and that’s what I’m going to explain next.
The first tweak you may try is to modify specific registry values that optimize the data throughput of the built-in backup engine. These entries are located under the key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Ntbackup\BackupEngine\ (if you don’t see the BackupEngine subkey you’ll have to run Windows Backup at least once). If you schedule a backup job, don’t forget that HKEY_CURRENT_USER must correspond to the user configured to run the job. There isn’t much information provided by Microsoft about these entries, so I’ll advise you to change them to the values provided by Microsoft IT:
Logical Disk Buffer Size = 64 Max Buffer Size = 1024 Max Num Tape Buffers = 16
Out of the box, NTBackup will give a data throughput of about 640 MB/min, when performing disk-to-disk backup. With these registry optimizations you’ll be able to reach 1200 MB/min, that’s twice the throughput you had before!
The next major tweak to improve performance is to get a new version of NTBackup. That’s right, Microsoft will release a new version of NTBackup with Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1. The good news is that you can put your hands on this new version today, just call Microsoft PSS and ask for the hotfix mentioned on article Q839272. Basically you’ll get a revised version of NTBackup that provides a new command-prompt switch, /FU. The switch enables a “file unbuffered” setting to bypass the cache manager and thus resolving a cache contention issue. This change provides a number of benefits during the disk-to-disk backup process:
• Sustainable throughput over time (remember the 1200 MB/min data throughput? Without the revised version that throughput will suffer some degradation) • Reduction in processor utilization (peak utilization reduced to 30 percent on average) • Elimination of impacts to the system process during the backup job
I made some basic testing and measures with and without this new switch. The measures were made by backing up a 2GB file to a SAN disk on an HP StorageWorks Enterprise Virtual Array 5000. For this specific hardware, Microsoft also recommends that you disable mirrored write-back cache on all dedicated backup disks. I present you the results on the next table.
Without /FU With /FU Mirrored Write-Back 1:41 1:18 Mirrored cache disabled 1:42 1:09 Table 1 – Total backup time
You can notice a 23% improvement just by using the /FU switch. This value grows up to 33% when you disable the specific HP EVA 5000 mirrored write-back cache.
I showed you how to improve backup performance by modifying some registry values and by using a revised version of Windows Backup. Don’t forget that there are many other things involved in a backup solution, so you’ll have to do further testing on your own environment, but with the tweaks I mentioned is almost a certain that you’ll see a boost on throughput.
There are some articles you should check in order to get more information:
“How to Back Up and Restore an Exchange Computer by Using the Windows Backup Program” http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=258243
“System performance is negatively affected when Ntbackup.exe writes to a destination .bkf file” http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=839272
“Backup Process Used with Clustered Exchange Server 2003 Servers at Microsoft” http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/msit/operations/exchbkup.mspx 19 gennaio Issues so far with the Inter-Org DL Migration Script*** I'M NO LONGER MAiNTAINING THIS BLOG, SO PLEASE CHECK MY NEW ONE: http://msmvps.com/ehlo/category/1456.aspx ****
So far, these are the known issues with the script: #1- Hidden DLs won't migrate #2- You get an empty file when you run the CSVDE command #3- You cannot run the CSVDE command
Any feedback about these issues is welcome. You can reach me by posting a comment here, or by the email address provided inside the script. 30 dicembre Inter-Org Distribution List Migration[For up-to-date information, please visit http://msmvps.com/ehlo]
I recently published this article on the MSD2D.com site. I'll try to post here any developments I make on the script.
Almost 40% of the current Microsoft Exchange customers are still using Exchange 5.5. Probably most of them have plans to migrate to the latest version, Exchange 2003 SP1, in the near future. There is lots of literature available about the right procedures for such a task, so if we’re not talking about something very complex, the migration process should be painless. One of the difficulties you should be aware of (and now I’m speaking particularly for those who are about to migrate) is the migration of the old Exchange 5.5 Distribution Lists (DLs) to the new Universal Distribution Groups (UDGs) in Active Directory, when in an inter-organization scenario. Migrating DLs in the same organization doesn't represent any challenge, because you can use Active Directory Connector (ADC). Normally, you’ll use Active Directory Connector (ADC) to automate this task. When in the same organization, the ADC replicates all the Exchange Server Distribution Lists to Active Directory as Universal Distribution Groups. But when you do synchronization from an Exchange Directory on a different organization, all you get on Active Directory is mail enabled contacts.
The only way I know to migrate DLs in this scenario (without using third party tools) is by exporting the DLs, and then using the LDIFDE or CSVDE command-line utilities to convert them to UDGs. I had recently the opportunity to work on a client who needed this DL migration process, so a couple of colleagues of mine, Paulo Lopes and Paulo R. Lopes (they’re not related, before you ask), with a little contribution from myself, came up with the method I’ll describe next.
You can run the following command to perform a DL export from an Exchange 5.5 server (E55SERVER) in a Windows NT 4.0 Domain (NT4DOMAIN), using an NT4 account (NT4ACCOUNT) as the credentials:
ldifde -m -f DL_E55_OUT.txt -s E55SERVER -u -r "(objectClass=groupOfNames)" -l objectClass,rdn,cn,mail,otherMailbox,Extension-Attribute-1,Extension-Attribute-2,Extension-Attribute-3,Extension-Attribute-4,Extension-Attribute-5,Extension-Attribute-6,Extension-Attribute-7,Extension-Attribute-8,Extension-Attribute-9,Extension-Attribute-10,Extension-Attribute-11,Extension-Attribute-12,Extension-Attribute-13,Extension-Attribute-14,Extension-Attribute-15,textEncodedORaddress,uid,member -b NT4ACCOUNT NT4DOMAIN *
Then you must run a CSVDE export, in order to get the right Display Name:
csvde -f MB_E55_OUT.txt -s E55SERVER -u -r "(objectClass=*)" -l objectClass,Admin-Display-Name,rdn,cn -b NTACCOUNT NT4DOMAIN *
The last step to import the DLs to Active Directory is to run LDIFDE again:
ldifde -i -f DL_E55_IN.txt -s <GC_SERVER> -j .\
The main problem with this method is that you’ll have to do some tweaking on those LDFIDE and CSVDE files in order to import them properly to the Active Directory. This can become a long, long time-consuming task (I know, I’ve been there). So I decided to create a script in order to automate this process. Here is a brief description of what the script does:
1. Extracts Distribution Lists to a file using LDIFDE; 2. Extracts Exchange 5.5 Directory to a file using CSVDE (this is only necessary to match a user's display name to his account name); 3. Modifies the first extracted file so that it can be imported using LDIFDE. Here is where the script does all its magic; 4. Imports DLs to Active directory as UDGs.
You still have to use ADC to synchronize the GAL. In fact, you must first import Exchange 5.5 users if you want the migrated DLs to be populated. So I strongly advise you to read the following KB article: XGEN: How to Configure a Two-Way Recipient Connection Agreement for Exchange Server 5.5 User, http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=296260
Don’t forget that before you can run the script, you’ll have to modify the following variables: strDN: the Distinguished Name of the destination OU E55Server: the Exchange 5.5 server GCServer: the Global Catalog server NTUser: the NT User Account to connect to the source domain NTDomain: the NT source domain
I don’t wish to bother you with one of those big disclaimers about responsibility or copyright, so I’ll just say that I’m offering you this script with the best of intentions, but you should always test before doing anything that can compromise your production environment. Besides that, feel free to distribute it to all your friends and to modify it, although I would appreciate that you drop me an email in case of new improvements. Any feedback is always welcome. The script is availbale on this link: http://www.msd2d.com/fileUploads/f9bcb0b1-7263-4d97-9b49-14ac6d62ff26/DLMig_0.3.10.zip Exchange 2003 Memory OptimizationThis is a copy of an article I wrote for MSD2D.com:
Anyone who knows Exchange has probably heard by now that Exchange is a memory eater. As a rule of thumb one might say that the first measure to improve Exchange performance is to provide more memory to the server. The store process is the main responsible for this behaviour, since store.exe starts it will grab as much memory as it can possibly get. This behaviour is often wrongly seen as a problem or as a memory leak, but actually it’s a normal and expected operation. Besides, Exchange can return memory to the operating system using an algorithm known as Dynamic Buffer Allocation. And yes, you can limit the maximum amount of memory that Exchange uses by reducing the ESE Buffer size.
By these days, memory is not as expensive as it used to be, so it’s easy to find Exchange servers with a couple of GB of RAM. But with all this memory, you’ll have to give a little help to make Exchange use it wisely. If you have a server with more than 1GB of RAM, there are some configuration parameters you can change in order to optimize Exchange memory usage.
I’ll describe the modifications you should do just for Exchange 2003 running on Windows 2003. There are slightly differences for Windows 2000, but I will not mention them in order to keep this article shorter (if you really want to know the differences feel free to drop me an email). You should not make any modifications to servers that do not contain any mailboxes or public folders (front-ends or bridgeheads), neither to Exchange Server computers which are at the same time Active Directory Domain Controllers or Global Catalogs.
After making all of these modifications you must restart your server for these changes to take effect.
Remember that there is no point in having a dedicated Exchange server with more than 4GB of memory. Although this may constitute a surprise for some of you, Exchange Server does not support instancing, Physical Address Extension (PAE), or Address Windowing Extensions (AWE). Therefore, 4 GB of RAM is the maximum amount of memory that an Exchange Server computer can efficiently use.
If you want to know more about Exchange Server memory usage, there are some Knowledge Base articles dedicated to this issue:
“How to Optimize Memory Usage in Exchange Server 2003” http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=815372
“Using the /Userva Switch on Windows Server 2003-based computer that are running Exchange Server” http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=810371
“The "HeapDecommitFreeBlockThreshold" registry key” http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=315407
“CPU and Memory Scalability for Exchange 2000 and Exchange 2003” http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=827281
“How to troubleshoot virtual memory fragmentation in Exchange Server 2003 and Exchange 2000 Server” 10 dicembre ehlo worldPrimeiro que tudo, desculpem-me o plágio do título deste post. É que eu vi este trocadilho recentemente algures na internet, embora nao me lembre onde. Pois bem, ainda não decidi ao certo o que escrever neste blog, se será uma continuação do meu outro blog que tenho num concorrente do MSN Spaces :-) Por isso enquanto não "posto" aqui, fazem favor de se dirigirem a http://ehlo.blogspot.com. * For those of you who don't understand Portuguese, don't worry! I've just said a bunch of silly things. |
|
|